Measurement and analysis of ultimate mechanical properties, stress-strain curve fit, and elastic modulus formula of human abdominal aortic aneurysm and nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta.


Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
The maximal strain, stress, elastic modulus, and stress-strain curve fitting of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and bidirectional nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta (NAA) were measured and analyzed to obtain the ultimate mechanical properties, the more approximate stress-strain curve-fitting, and the elastic modulus formula of AAA and NAA.

METHODS:
Fourteen human AAA samples were harvested from patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair.

Twelve NAA samples comprised of six longitudinal-circumferential pairs of NAA from six cadaveric organ donors were used as controls.

Samples were mounted on a tensile-testing machine and force was applied until breakage occurred.

The maximal strain, stress, and elastic modulus were calculated and a stress-strain curve was plotted for each sample.

Exponential and second-order polynomial curves were used to fit the stress-strain curve, and the means were estimated by comparing the R2 (coefficient of determination that represents the strength of a curve fitting). Coefficients of elastic modulus were calculated and analyzed, and the incremental tendency of each modulus was evaluated by comparing the difference of coefficients.

RESULTS:
There was no significant difference in maximal stress among AAA, circumferential aortic aneurysms (CAA), and longitudinal aortic aneurysms (LAA). However, AAA maximal strain was significantly less (P < .01) than that of bidirectional NAA. AAA maximal elastic modulus was significantly greater than that of CAA and LAA (P < .01 and .05, respectively). R2 of AAA for second-order polynomial curve was significantly greater (P < .05) than that for the exponential curve.

For the elastic modulus formula from the second-order polynomial curve, E = 2ax + b, the average value of a for the AAA was significantly greater (P < .01) than that for the bidirectional NAA, but there was no significant difference (P > .05) among the three groups for the average value of b.

CONCLUSIONS:
Tensile test measurements can successfully analyze ultimate mechanical properties of AAA and NAA. AAA is stiffer and less distensible than NAA under the same maximal stress. Second-order polynomial curve fitting provides a more approximate description for AAA stress-strain curve than exponential curve fitting does.

Formula variables a of the elastic modulus formula from second-order polynomial curve fitting can determine the incremental tendency of the elastic modulus, while b has negligible effect on the incremental tendency of the elastic modulus.


Full Text

  • DOI - Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (DOI)
  • EBSCO - full-text online (subscription/membership/fee required)
  • Elsevier Science - full-text online (subscription/membership/fee required)
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc. - full-text online (subscription/membership/fee required)
  • Swets Information Services - full-text online (subscription/membership/fee required)

Subjects


Similar articles

Authors


Publication date

2008-06-30


Journal

Journal of vascular surgery
J Vasc Surg (0741-5214)

Journal topics


Language

Eng.


Copyright

Journal of vascular surgery : official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter

Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou, China PR.


Release reference

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):189-95



Related books


Español | English

© Galenicom 1999-2013