Can 18-FDG-PET during radiotherapy replace post-therapy scanning for detection/demonstration of tumor response in head-and-neck cancer?


Abstract

The high specificity and positive predictive value for the evaluation of tumor response with PET2 and PET3 might avoid unnecessary salvage surgery in patients with a CR. In contrast to PET3, the sensitivity of PET 2 was low, and the difference in OS between the CR and NCR groups was not significantly different. Therefore, the evaluation of the tumor response with FDG-PET at 4 months after RT completion cannot be replaced by FDG-PET during RT at 47 Gy.


Full Text


Subjects


Similar articles

Español | English

© Galenicom 1999-2013