The air-Q(®) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure.


Abstract

We performed a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing the air-Q(®) against the LMA-ProSeal™ in adults undergoing general anaesthesia.

One hundred subjects (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3) presenting for elective, outpatient surgery were randomly assigned to 52 air-Q(®) and 48 ProSeal devices.

The primary study endpoint was airway seal pressure.

Oropharyngolaryngeal morbidity was assessed secondarily.

Mean (SD) airway seal pressures for the air-Q(®) and ProSeal were 30 (7) cmH (2) O and 30 (6) cmH(2) O, respectively (p = 0.47). Postoperative sore throat was more common with the air-Q(®) (46% vs 38%, p = 0.03) as was pain on swallowing (30% vs 5%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the air-Q(®) performs well as a primary airway during the maintenance of general anaesthesia with an airway seal pressure similar to that of the ProSeal, but with a higher incidence of postoperative oropharyngolaryngeal complaints.


Full Text


Subjects


Similar articles

Authors


Publication date

2011-11-10


Journal

Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia (1365-2044)

Journal topics


Language

Eng.


Copyright

Anaesthesia

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.


Release reference

Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100



Related books


Español | English

© Galenicom 1999-2013