A comparison of parallel and diverging screw angles in the stability of locked plate constructs.


Abstract

We investigated the static and cyclical strength of parallel and angulated locking plate screws using rigid polyurethane foam (0.32 g/cm(3)) and bovine cancellous bone blocks. Custom-made stainless steel plates with two conically threaded screw holes with different angulations (parallel, 10° and 20° divergent) and 5 mm self-tapping locking screws underwent pull-out and cyclical pull and bending tests.

The bovine cancellous blocks were only subjected to static pull-out testing.

We also performed finite element analysis for the static pull-out test of the parallel and 20° configurations.

In both the foam model and the bovine cancellous bone we found the significantly highest pull-out force for the parallel constructs.

In the finite element analysis there was a 47% more damage in the 20° divergent constructs than in the parallel configuration.

Under cyclical loading, the mean number of cycles to failure was significantly higher for the parallel group, followed by the 10° and 20° divergent configurations.

In our laboratory setting we clearly showed the biomechanical disadvantage of a diverging locking screw angle under static and cyclical loading.


Full Text

  • DOI - The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume (DOI)
  • HighWire Press - full-text online
  • EBSCO - full-text online

Subjects


Similar articles

Authors


Publication date

2011-09-13


Journal

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
J Bone Joint Surg Br (0301-620X)

Journal topics


Language

Eng.


Copyright

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume

University Hospital Münster, Department of Trauma Surgery, Waldeyerstrasse 1, Münster 48149, Germany. dirk.waehnert [at] aofoundation.org


Release reference

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1259-64



Related books


Español | English

© Galenicom 1999-2013