We obtained information from the Elective Orthopaedic Centre on 1523 patients with baseline and six-month Oxford hip scores (OHS) after undergoing primary hip replacement (THR) and 1784 patients with Oxford knee scores (OKS) for primary knee replacement (TKR) who completed a six-month satisfaction questionnaire.
Receiver operating characteristic curves identified an absolute change in OHS of 14 points or more as the point that discriminates best between patients' satisfaction levels and an 11-point change for the OKS. Satisfaction is highest (97.6%) in patients with an absolute change in OHS of 14 points or more, compared with lower levels of satisfaction (81.8%) below this threshold. Similarly, an 11-point absolute change in OKS was associated with 95.4% satisfaction compared with 76.5% below this threshold.
For the six-month OHS a score of 35 points or more distinguished patients with the highest satisfaction level, and for the six-month OKS 30 points or more identified the highest level of satisfaction.
The thresholds varied according to patients' pre-operative score, where those with severe pre-operative pain/function required a lower six-month score to achieve the highest levels of satisfaction.
Our data suggest that the choice of a six-month follow-up to assess patient-reported outcomes of THR/TKR is acceptable.
The thresholds help to differentiate between patients with different levels of satisfaction, but external validation will be required prior to general implementation in clinical practice.
2012-02-28
Eng.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
University of Oxford, Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. andrew.judge [at] ndorms.ox.ac.uk
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):412-8
© Galenicom 1999-2013