Grounded theory and methods related to expert practice development in medical laboratory science were described using data from a large national survey of medical laboratory scientists (MLS) overlaid on findings from analysis of expert practice domains reported in nursing literature.
An extensive focus group/expert review iterative process followed by a survey of MLS practitioners produced 25 critical thinking (CT) behaviors important in expert practice.
Factor analysis was applied to discern common threads or themes linking the CT behaviors.
The 25 important CT behaviors were reduced to a 7-factor structure representing constructs underlying the individual, observable CT behaviors.
This 7-factor structure in MLS was compared to the 7 practice domains identified in expert nursing practice.
The comparison yielded commonality between MLS and nursing in CT behaviors observed in the 7 expert practice domains of both professions: professional techniques, caring communication, growing professionally, setting priorities, practicing with judgment, anticipating/revising, and creating unique meaning.
Emergent grounded theory is that (1) critical thinking is a metaprocess that facilitates learning by interlinking the more basic processes associated with different learning orientations: cognitivist, behaviorist, humanist (affective), and situated/contextual learning, (2) CT behaviors are observable events following from the CT metaprocess, and (3) observations of CT behaviors increase as practice advances from novice to expert.
Identification and definition of CT behaviors, i.e., practice competencies, along the continuum of novice to expert can serve as the foundation for MLS curriculum and instructional design as well as measurement and evaluation in both formal and continuing education settings.
2012-03-16
Eng.
Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology
Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. eleibach [at] cdc.gov
Clin Lab Sci. 2011 ;24(4 Suppl):4-37-44
© Galenicom 1999-2013