|
|
The effect of proactively identifying smokers and offering smoking cessation support in primary care populations: a cluster-randomized trial.| Authors: | Rachael L Murray, Timothy Coleman, Marilyn Antoniak, Joanne Stocks, Alexia Fergus, John Britton, Sarah A Lewis | | Language: | Eng. | | Date: | 16-05-2008 | | Journal: | Addiction (Abingdon, England)
(0965-2140)
| | Release: | Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):998-1006; discussion 1007-8 | |
|
|
Abstract:
| AIMS:
To establish whether proactively identifying all smokers in primary care populations and offering smoking cessation support is effective in increasing long-term abstinence from smoking.
DESIGN:
Cluster randomized controlled trial.
SETTING:
Twenty-four general practices in Nottinghamshire, randomized by practice to active or control intervention.
PARTICIPANTS:
All adult patients registered with the practices who returned a questionnaire confirming that they were current smokers (n = 6856).
INTERVENTION:
Participants were offered smoking cessation support by letter and those interested in receiving it were contacted and referred into National Health Service (NHS) stop smoking services if required. MEASUREMENTS: Validated abstinence from smoking, use of smoking cessation services and number of quit attempts in continuing smokers at 6 months. FINDINGS: Smokers in the intervention group were more likely than controls to report that they had used local cessation services during the study period [16.6% and 8.9%, respectively, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-2.78], and continuing smokers (in the intervention group) were more likely to have made a quit attempt in the last 6 months (37.4% and 33.3%, respectively, adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.51). Validated point prevalence abstinence from smoking at 6 months was higher in the intervention than the control groups (3.5% and 2.5%, respectively) but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR controlling for covariates: 1.64, 95% CI 0.92-2.89).
CONCLUSIONS:
Proactively identifying smokers who want to quit in primary care populations, and referring them to a cessation service, increased contacts with cessation services and the number of quit attempts. We were unable to detect a significant effect on long-term cessation rates, but the study was not powered to detect the kind of difference that might be expected.
| | Copyright: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. rachael.murray@nottingham.ac.uk | | Full text: | EBSCO - HTML (needs subscription) | | |
|
|
|
| Add to my archive
|
Articles from other specialties: Anaesthesiology, Vascular Surgery - Angiology, Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Occupational Medicine, Psychiatry, Forensic and Legal Medicine, Pulmonology |